Friday, 20 March 2015

Representation of women in African literature



Representation of women in African literature

 with reference to the novels, Things Fall Apart, A Grain of Wheat, and Waiting for the Barbarians










Introduction


Women’s place in society is thought a lot in contemporary studies. As well in literature, women’s representation is observed and criticized with feminist approach.

Like most literature around the world, African literature also portrayed women in different shades. Incomplete and inaccurate female characters littered early African works. The fact, like other literature, African literature was first written by men. Educated African men not only come from patriarchal society but were educated by colonizers, who also come from patriarchal society. Some feminist critics say that male francophone African writers routinely portray their female characters in the stereotype of an oppressed and subjugated wife who has little if any say in shaping her destiny or changing the system that deprives and oppresses her.

Feminist critics argue that male writers depict female characters as “defined by their relationships to men – someone’s daughter or wife, or mother, shadowy figures who hover on the fringes of the plot, suckling infants, cooking, planting their hair … they fall into a specific category of female stereotypes of… men appendages, and prostitutes, or courtesans.”

Female characters have not their own identity or story to be called or celebrated. But they are always portrayed as less heroic than men and in periphery.

“Black male writers portray women as ‘passive’ mothers with neither personality nor character or problems, accepting their condition and thus exhibiting no spirit of revolt or freedom.” Male writers routinely portray “voiceless resigned and docile woman.”

But still in some cases, as a stereotype, the idea of an ‘African dilemma’ is there with representation of women. African women have to choose between being true to their traditional culture and embracing the colonizing western culture and having equal rights is an interesting one.

The study of women characters, portrayed in African colonized literature is an interesting, with that, one can know human nature of colonizing, marginalizing or making other race gender religion subaltern.

Does African culture do the same with their women? Do they also colonizing women? How is she portrayed in African literature, how is it capturing their woman characters and men’s behaviour with them?

For that, I selected three famous novels from our course, Things Fall Apart, A Grain of Wheat, and Waiting for Barbarians. The writers of these novels are renowned and much popular. Let’s see how woman is represented by these writers one by one.

‘Things Fall Apart’ by Chinua Achebe

One of the earlier and well-known writers is Chinua Achebe. His novel ‘Things Fall Apart’ is also famous one. He has been criticized for neglecting to represent women almost completely. Many women in the novel are flat characters who are satisfied with oppressive structures like polygamy. Like Okonkwo’s wives. (He is having multiple wives!!!)

While critics are condemn Achebe for being too male-focused, there could be many reasons for this lack of female representation. One is that, readers are seeing the culture and events largely from Okonkwo’s point of view, who could be said to have unenlightened gender views by Ibo standards.

For example when he is sent to his mother’s village, he cannot answer to his uncle why a common name and saying is “mother is supreme” Uchendu, his uncle, replies, “A man belongs to his father land when things are good and life is sweet. But when there is sorrow and bitterness he finds refuge in his motherland. Your mother is there to protect you. She is buried there that’s why we say mother is supreme.”

In these words women as mother is respected.

The portrayal of Okonkwo’s daughter, Ezinma, is the only visible rounded female character in the novel. There is evidence in the novel which suggests that Achebe was showing ridiculous nature of a strong patriarchal society. Ezinma was intelligent enough to eventually run the family the way Okonkwo wanted. As Okonkwo says,

“She has the right spirit”


Okonkwo is unable to think outside of his cultural paradigm, when Ezinma offers to carry Okonkwo's chair to the wrestling match, traditionally a boy's job, okonkwo says, "No, that is a boy's job." Instead of finding a way to let Ezinma run the home, he only comments that, "she should have been boy."

It shows Achebe's poverty in describing woman character in patriarchal world. Still there was not much female representation in the novel. It is important to realize that Achebe wrote this novel to justify his native culture, where women become victims, to European audiences, who were patriarchal themselves.

Overall, with the exception of Ezinma, Achebe’s female characters in the novel were not rounded or visible. In the novel, Okonkwo carries more space and female characters are marginalized in narrated patriarchal culture.

‘A Grain of Wheat’ by Ngugi Wa Thiongo

Ngugi Wa Thiongo is an internationally acclaimed African writer and human rights activist. He has usually championed for the promotion of African women and other marginalized groups in African society.

‘A Grain of Wheat’ is political narrative talking about Mau Mau Kenyan movement placed in forest. The movement included both men and women against British colonizers. Women played remarkable role directly or indirectly in that rebellion.

Ngugi pays respect to these women and celebrates their limitless sacrifices, their contribution and struggle for freedom of the homeland in this novel, ‘A Grain of Wheat’.

The novel describes heroic women as providing the invisible backbone to the movement. The writer also made use of traditional African values of womanhood to fight with the enemies.

Wambui, the major character in the novel, is a model of the resistant woman during emergency; she carried secrets from the villages to towns. Incident of Wambui and policeman is very significant in portraying her character.

Charles A. Nama argues that, “ Ngugi’s heroines occupy a special place in his fiction, especially with respect to their function as custodians and defenders of traditional Gikuyu culture.”

For example when Karanja, Kihika and Gikonyo encounter Mumbi at Gikonyo’s workshop, she is addressed respectfully as Karanja calls her “mother of Men, we have come make us some tea.” Kihika, the Mau Mau hero in the novel, refers to the homeland as mother as he proudly says, “With us, Kenya is our mother”

Female identities and anatomies become symbolically bound to motherhood and to the nation. We can find privileging of motherhood in Ngugi’s fiction.

In the novel, where Gikonyo has an inferiority, Mumbi is more self-assured and capable of action. Gikonyo's mother, Wangari, refuses to accept defeat when her husband beats and rejects her, accusing her of sexual coldness. She displays undaunted courage when she settles in Thabai with her baby son. 
As already described, Wambui introduces the active role role of women in the movement, while Karanja's mother mirrors Nyokabi's defiance of the traditional female role, as as she questions the action of men.

So, Ngugi Wa Theongo enrich African literature with portraying his woman characters strong, courageous and patriotic who equally, sometimes more, than male characters, participate in struggle for freedom.
Ngugi’s this novel is the best example of women’s heroic portrayal and his women characters become inspirational from traditional one.

‘Waiting for the Barbarians’ by J. M. Coetzee
‘Waiting for the Barbarians’ set in an indeterminate place and time. It is an allegory about the evils of colonialism. The story is told with point of view of a Magistrate.

The novel has one woman character, Barbarian girl, with whom portrayal of woman character can be studied. Actually Barbarian girl is a symbol of colonized. Her relationship with Magistrate is of slave and master. She is tortured by colonizers much. She is not only colonized by empire but as a woman by the Magistrate as well. He uses her body as an object.

The narration never gives the view point of the Barbarian girl, but the magistrate attempts to understand feminine viewpoint. He is even at one point dressed as a woman by his torturers who are servants of the empire. This event can be very symbolical.

The empire and the barbarian culture are symbolically represented by the magistrate and the barbarian girl and their relationship the same. The magistrate sometimes sympathizes the girl but it is also true that he uses as an object, he becomes cause of her sorrows.

Sometimes the girl plays a role of catalyst for the change that takes place in the magistrate; she fulfils the role as colonized woman.

Coetzee’s choice to put a girl as symbol of colonized, slave and subaltern indicates woman’s position in society and in men’s mind. Choice of woman instead of man like Robinson Crusoe symbolically shows gender inequality. It also fulfils men’s wish to see women as slave or inferior with portraying these two characters.

Conclusion

These three famous African novels represent women differently. One has no significant space for women. One made women courageous, strong, and even greater than men; and one made it slave, colonized, inferior. These different portrayals shows women’s role in different situations and different cultures, which is moving not static.







Do we really need film censorship?



Do we really need film censorship?

Introduction:

What is censorship?

Censorship can be broadly defined as the suppression of knowledge or ideas. They are used by Governments or organisations to prevent the circulation of material. In wartime information about troop activities, future battle plans etc., will be censored. In peacetime censorship can be more problematic and controversial.





The Censorship of films:
Censorship of art dates back to the early 16th century when Roman magistrates would censere or assess and give their opinion about various arts which would affect public life. By the first decade of the twentieth century, film censorship boards had come up in various parts of the world.

In different countries, films are censored to monitor for varying levels of social and political issues, the depiction of which may be deemed disturbing for the people. Violence, sexual content, abusive language, drug use, abusive content, revolutionary content, and human rights violations are common factors that come under the censorship “snip”. Censorship has been used as a political vehicle disallowing ideas contrary or inimical to the regime.

The film rating system is one of the most common forms of censorship in any country.


Film censorship in India:

The Central Board of Film Certification, the regulatory film body of India, regularly orders directors to remove anything it deems offensive, including sex, nudity, violence or subjects considered politically subversive. In India, the film censor board members have been chosen from among industry veterans, public office holders, renowned intellectuals, and public leaders.

Is censorship really necessary or needed?
Effects of media on the audience have mainly been conducted in relation to TV audiences and focussed on the issue of violence. For example, in laboratory conditions children have been shown violent film clips and then their behaviour has been monitored afterwards to see if they act more aggressively than a control group that has not been shown violent films.

Content Analysis has also been employed to count the number of acts of violence, violent language and related actions in a specific film. A high score would rate the film as being more likely to inspire aggressive reactions than a low scoring film.

Polls and surveys, and test screenings are another means of determining how an audience responds to a film.

Critics claim that such studies are limited as they do not consider the wider context of the film and its effect on the viewer. A direct cause and effect - viewing a violent film causing aggressive behaviour - has been very hard to establish on a scientific basis.

According to the Supreme Court of India:

“Film censorship becomes necessary because a film motivates thought and action and assures a high degree of attention and retention as compared to the printed word. The combination of act and speech, sight and sound in semi darkness of the theatre with elimination of all distracting ideas will have a strong impact on the minds of the viewers and can affect emotions...” (Wikipedia)

But if movies affect human mind and behaviour so much than it is not in anyone’s hand to control. It means censorship can censor some scenes of the movie but it cannot control incepting ideas indirectly by movies.

As scenes of smoking have been censored in India and it is compulsory to show notice of injuries of smoking. But in the movies central character, like hero or protagonist is smoking, no one will going to read the given notice but the impact of that scene affects viewers mind that to smoke is a heroic act.

Considering cinema as one genre of art, it also shows mirror of society, mirror to society. If all the movies deal with moral messaging or preaching than who will going to see them?! And with so many morals it becomes religious preacher.

If movies are about human life and for humans, if it is showing all human emotions than, there must be all emotions, all Rasas, including disgust or erotic or fury etc.

In ‘modern’ time movies are not melodramatic; they have not all good or virtuous things to say. Modern Indian cinema is becoming more ‘life like’. It tries to express all human emotions in more realistic way. There is no melodrama, no exaggeration, and no supernatural elements.

But we should also not forget that, recent movies have more number of vulgar scenes, have been put by the directors so as to collect high revenues for the movie.

Expression of human emotions is another thing, which is realistic and has more artistic ability. But at some extent, it is converted into vulgarity by some cheap movies. And slowly and steadily, this vulgarity becomes fashion. Now there is not any kind of realism but it becomes lusty and vulgar which can damage society and culture.

For example, objectification of female body. Some parallel movies, in context of their story and background, have portrayed women character in their gray shades, but the aim is to present reality. Like the movie Talash – which talks about prostitutes- prostitution.

But we can hardly find any recent popular movie which has not item song or vulgar song, lyrics, cheap double meaning comedy. With these types of movies, one can judge, not only taste of people, but culture and its mentality. For example recent movies of Sunny Leone, which has no reality, emotions or good story, there are only for earning money.

This type of objectification harms society, culture and increase crime ratio. For this reason film censorship is needed more.

Censorship can erase some of the vulgar and adult scenes from the movie, but the harm movie is doing cannot be controlled by censor board. Because when anything is banned or prohibited, it is seen more with excitement and amusement to know why it is prohibited. Indirect way whatever the movie is incepting cannot be controlled by anyone, by censor board.

To control harm of culture, youth or society, people should change their mentality. Movies also have to change. They must have mature, realistic content, not vulgar nude or violent.

It doesn’t mean that every movie has moral preaching or all virtuous things. Even religious books also don’t have all good things. There is violence in every religious book like Ramayana or Mahabharata. But films have at least mature content not cheap or vulgar that affects viewers mind so much.

At some extent film censorship is necessary to filter some movies, which is cheap and full of vulgarity. But when censorship becomes barrier to pure, free art, means realistic, critically appreciated movies; it becomes harmful to art and create bad impression of rigid society.

It also raises question of freedom of expression, if film censorship interferes much. But this freedom should not be turned into anarchy or chaos otherwise it creates culture chaotic and without morality or values.

The best Indian examples are…



In 2003 Indian censor board banned the film 'Gulabi Aina' (Pink Mirror), a film on Indian transsexuals, produced by Shridhar Rangayan. The board cited that the film was vulgar and offensive. The film maker appealed twice again unsuccessfully. The film still remains banned in India.

But has screened at numerous festivals all over the world and won awards. The critics have appreciated it for its sensitive and touching portrayal of marginalized community.

So, film censorship has to understand and differentiate which movie presents human emotions in more realistic way and which movie is incepting vulgarity, violence and objectifying female body with its vulgar and cheap comments.

Board is necessary if it recognises films and their impact on society appropriately. But banning never helps to protect society, or to control culture. It shows rigidity and immaturity of society.

Society should be mature enough not only for making movies but to understand difference between real and imagined. And if society becomes so mature, free, acceptable and artistic, any kind of censorship is not needed. There will be complete freedom of expression, and even society or public will not accept, reject cheap or vulgar films automatically and they will never affect mature society any more…


Bibliography
Wikipedia contributors. "Censorship in India." Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia. Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia, 6 Nov. 2014. Web. 20 Mar. 2015

http://www.talkingpix.co.uk/ArticleCensorship.html



Friday, 13 March 2015

Ann Gray's concept of knowability with reference to 'The Sense of an Ending'

Maharaja Krishnakumarsinhji Bhavnagar University Bhavnagar
Smt. S. B. Guardy Department of English

Written by: Poojaba G. Jadeja
Roll No.: 20
Year: 2015, Semester: 4th
Paper:10: The New Literature

Ann Gray’s concept of knowability
 with reference to The Sense of an Ending

Introduction:
Ann Gray in ‘Research Practice for Cultural studies’ (2003) elaborates three fundamental research questions that structure any research project.
1. What is there that can be known – what is knowable?
2. What is the relation of the knower to the known?
3. How do we find things out? 

A brief about The Sense of an Ending:
It is a novel, written by Julian Barnes. The Man Booker Prize winner novel is famous for its post-modern narrative technique, as memory novel and psychological thriller.
The story is of an old man Tony Webster, narrator, who tries to revisit his past and solve some of unsolved mysteries. His quest for getting knowledge about his friend – Adrian’s suicide and other characters lives can be elaborated with concept of knowability and three methodological questions. 

To get more idea about book, visit this small animated video of summery...


What is there that can be known – what is knowable?
This is an ontological question, it refers to the aspect of social reality to be studied, but it also deals with assumptions we are willing to make about the nature of reality. It requires you to take a position in relation to your project and to define your ‘knowable space’. How you construct your knowable space and how you go about exploring and investigating that knowable space will depend upon your theoretical approach to the social world and the actors
or texts involved. (Gray)



With reference to The Sense of an Ending
Illustrations from the text:
The novel describes journey or quest of getting knowledge of Tony Webster, who didn’t get, who never get properly!! The narrator tells his story and all the incidents with his memory and tries to evaluate past, and with that he also tries to get knowledge.
For Tony ‘Knowable’ is not only to know the reason of Adrian’s suicide or his diary or about Veronica but also to know about his own life, to illustrate his own memory and self examine, why he is not getting or what is problem with him.
As it is mentioned in explanation that,
“…it also deals with assumptions we are willing to make about the nature of reality…”
Here Tony, while in the process of getting knowledge, assumes many things at different stages.
For example: after part one, he is in assumption that ‘he knows’ all the things. After getting letter, he supposes that he now knows about Veronica and Adrian. After watching Adrian’s son, he becomes very sure that now he knows all the things… 
His all assumptions are constructed. With these stages, constructed knowledge, he didn’t get, or reach to true knowledge. With these stages his ‘knowable space’ is also changing and moving.
“How you construct your knowable space and how you go about exploring and investigating that knowable space will depend upon your theoretical approach…”
Tony does not stop with his assumptions (like Silas in Da Vinci Code). His one of the knowable space is “himself”. And one of the reasons of his keep investigating and processing towards knowledge, ignoring his assumptions, is his “self” as knowable space and his approach towards other events like Veronica’s words “you still don’t get it…” or other characters’ attitude towards him and his own memory, who tells him as he is not able to get sense.
Because of some incidences, he comes to know that whatever he believes is his assumptions and he proceed further. He decides his ‘knowable space’ with illustrating and investigating. He keeps on trying to reach true knowledge with his approach of investigating like going into several pubs and shops several times, ignoring his believed, constructed assumptions. 

What is the relation of the knower to the known?  
epistemological question and, put simply, asks how we know what we know. The assumptions that are made about this depend on how we perceive of the reality, and, although Guba does not suggest this, how we are located as subjects within our research. What we bring to our work, how our own knowledge and experience is brought to bear on the research itself will certainly shape it.
It is important to make these explicit. The point about who we are and how we relate to the project itself is a key issue. (Gray)
Illustrations from the text:
Relationship between knower and known is very important to evaluate. In the novel, Tony tells his own experiences with his memory. He is in self search and also in search of reasons and relations of other characters’ life.
In this process of knowing, Tony’s relationship is with self. He is insider. In his attempts of knowing anything his self becomes barrier. For example, his memory, a mirror or self projection always distract him.
He knows that Adrian and Veronica have relationship after his break up with her and, he also came to know from his friend that Adrian was happy and in love before his death. With these two statements, he makes an assumption that the reason for Adrian’s death or before his death he is in love with Veronica.
Only because of his partial memory, he cannot know that Adrian has relationship with Mr. Sarah Ford. As he is subjective and inside his memory and assumptions, he cannot know the things clearly.
All the time, he gets true knowledge from outside. Like, he comes to know about his cruel letter when it is given by Veronica.
He can know himself when Margaret communicates with him. Even he gets the “Knowledge” about young Adrian when other person Terry tells him that “Mary is not his mother, but sister…”
So, when ‘he is in his own’, he cannot reach to the knowledge. Even when he assumes that the young Adrian is son of Adrian and Veronica, if Veronica did not tell him “You still don’t get…” perhaps he can never reach to his knowledge.
Thus, in Tony’s case the relationship is self with self and self itself becomes barrier of knowledge. And whenever Tony becomes objective, he gets knowledge from outside and reach where he wants to…
So, his view is from inside and he perceives reality from outside. With ignoring his assumptions, he shapes his way to get knowledge from outside.

How do we find things out? Or What is the procedure of knowledge?
This is methodological questions. What kind of methods must I employ in order to know, or to put me in a position of being able to interpret and analyse this aspect of the social world? This, then, is where one can begin to think about the kinds of data we need and how to gather it in order to begin to explore research questions. (Gray)



 Illustrations from the text:

With example of both chapters and narrative style, we can say, Tony always tries to aware readers that, whatever he is telling is not hundred percent true but it is what he remembers. Tony, in his narration, goes on deconstructing his own words. He even accepts that what he said is not trustworthy but with his own cast of mind. Some of beautiful quotes in the novel suggest this thing clearly.
One of the way, to get knowledge of Tony, is to become out of own self. At some stage, he accepts that, “he is not getting sense” means he knows that still he has to work hard to get knowledge (not like Silas or Fache in Da Vinci Code).
Though he constructed many assumptions in his case, from outside, he is also getting some kind of hints or knowledge which proves that he is not getting properly. So, he is not in blindness, but he keeps trying.
At every stage, he comes to know from outside. He knows his relationship with known and also barriers of his knowledge. So, he tries to be objective from subjective. He rejects his assumptions and accepts hints from outside with being objective.
He doubts his statements and tries to think the way knowledge comes to him from outside. In Tony’s procedure of knowledge, knowledge dawn upon him from outside, from other characters, after his several attempts.
Throughout the novel, everyone tries to give him hints or signs. Though he has inability to understand signs, which are in front of his eyes, and get the ‘sense’, he can reach to knowledge because of his ability to accept his inabilities, and to become objective with knowing his own self. He knows his barrier of his knowledge and tries to go beyond it, to overcome it.

Conclusion:
Thus, Tony’s journey to his knowable space is going on expanding in the second part and he tries to overcome from his subjective relationship with his self.
In the novel, Tony, the narrator’s quest for knowledge is interesting and amazing, and worthy to study. It becomes very exiting end when Tony meets with his knowledge and gets “his sense” after long journey.

Bibliography

Gray, Ann. Research Practice for Cultural studies. (2003) .
Barnes, Julian. The Sense of an Ending (2011)